[W4] VB2 348 - XF 364

[Sky9]

Spoiler: Room Pic

Spoiler: GP1

Spoiler: GP2

Spoiler: GP3

Spoiler: Lana's Game Crashed

Spoiler: Last race of GP3 pic after reset

Spoiler: Sky9's Turn Up Music

Host Conditionals were confirmed by Callum
GGs! close game see week 9
-Sky9​

 

[Jzck]

Didn’t realize this was a trolling war

 

[Fred Mkwii]

367 365 btw or for now
I got 9th on bcw

 

[Fred Mkwii]

Along with pulling 7 shocks in 9th, Kanto busted through the pack with power items on multiple occasions

Vid by Satnav

 

[Satnav]

Along with pulling 7 shocks in 9th, Kanto busted through the pack with power items on multiple occasions

Vid by Satnav

gamer time

 

[Rγøγα*]

We were attacked by many greens and blues.
And I was bad condition.
GGs.

 

[Callum]

We were attacked by many greens and blues.
And I was bad condition.
GGs.

what blues lol

 

[Niko]

Along with pulling 7 shocks in 9th, Kanto busted through the pack with power items on multiple occasions

Vid by Satnav

I'll just quote this post since the video's already there and since there somehow (lol) are 5 cases in one, I'll break it down quickly:

rDKJP:
We believe sufficient proof has been presented to show that Jack indeed was hit by Kanto's star in the off-road, leading the WL Council to penalise VB2 for this with -20.

rGV2, TF, rDS:
These cases unfortunately only have the call at the very best to support a penalty claim.
While the TF case especially could be in fact Kanto pushing Callum/bumping him in wheelie (since he slows down on the minimap by quite a bit), there are also still chances of something else having occured during that moment.
rGV2 has merely Kanto passing Callum in first while rDS is somewhat like TF
Therefore, all of These cases will be not penalised.

BCWii (by XF's bagger):
While the rule states that a bagger cannot interfere with a runner once the bagger races forward instead of going backward, we believe that the bump has practically done nothing to warrant a penalty.


Results will be changed to:

VB2 348 - 364 XF2

 

[Jzck]

I'll just quote this post since the video's already there and since there somehow (lol) are 5 cases in one, I'll break it down quickly:

rDKJP:
We believe sufficient proof has been presented to show that Jack indeed was hit by Kanto's star in the off-road, leading the WL Council to penalise VB2 for this with -20.

rGV2, TF, rDS:
These cases unfortunately only have the call at the very best to support a penalty claim.
While the TF case especially could be in fact Kanto pushing Callum/bumping him in wheelie (since he slows down on the minimap by quite a bit), there are also still chances of something else having occured during that moment.
rGV2 has merely Kanto passing Callum in first while rDS is somewhat like TF
Therefore, all of These cases will be not penalised.

BCWii (by XF's bagger):
While the rule states that a bagger cannot interfere with a runner once the bagger races forward instead of going backward, we believe that the bump has practically done nothing to warrant a penalty.


Results will be changed to:

VB2 348 - 364 XF2

🐐🐐

 

[Sky9]

To be honest I one hundred percent agree with this decision. It was still close a close game regardless of the outcome. GGs! XF see you week 9

 

[Satnav]

I'll just quote this post since the video's already there and since there somehow (lol) are 5 cases in one, I'll break it down quickly:

rDKJP:
We believe sufficient proof has been presented to show that Jack indeed was hit by Kanto's star in the off-road, leading the WL Council to penalise VB2 for this with -20.

rGV2, TF, rDS:
These cases unfortunately only have the call at the very best to support a penalty claim.
While the TF case especially could be in fact Kanto pushing Callum/bumping him in wheelie (since he slows down on the minimap by quite a bit), there are also still chances of something else having occured during that moment.
rGV2 has merely Kanto passing Callum in first while rDS is somewhat like TF
Therefore, all of These cases will be not penalised.

BCWii (by XF's bagger):
While the rule states that a bagger cannot interfere with a runner once the bagger races forward instead of going backward, we believe that the bump has practically done nothing to warrant a penalty.


Results will be changed to:

VB2 348 - 364 XF2

The gv2 clip was mainly for the purpose of showing that the bagger was quite careless with his items and movement to validate the other claims made in the vid. Thanks for sorting this out anyways though

To be honest I one hundred percent agree with this decision. It was still close a close game regardless of the outcome. GGs! XF see you week 9

Thanks for being mature about it

 

[Callum]

haha hit quan

 

[CallumSCO]

strikes again


im a good da